William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
STICKY WIKI – AT 9:30 A.M. ET: The Brits have done vastly better reporting on WikiLeaks and its sleazy spiritual leader, Julian Assange, than has the American press. For example, Iain Dale in London's Daily Mail, asks the following:
Well put, don't you think? When the Brit writers get going, they really get going.
Dale makes the reasonable point that whistleblowing and exposure can have honorable motives. But he doesn't attribute honor to the wicked Wikis:
Read the whole piece. Well worth it. Try to find that kind of commentary on this side of the pond, in the mainstream media. You'll be looking a long time. And, while you're at it, read this companion piece in the Mail:
Good reporting, juicily served. Assange is major sleaze, and some of the beautiful people supporting him are going to seem far less beautiful when all the facts come out. But the most important facts are those still not explored: Who leaked these documents? As we've said, they certainly weren't all leaked by one little Army private now in custody. As Americans, we have a right to know who violated their public trust, and why. True journalists should be Woodwarding and Bernsteining all over the place, but they are not. There is no career advancement to be had in exposing corruption in a liberal administration, except maybe at Fox News or The Wall Street Journal. We hope they have reporters on the case. December 20, 2010 |
|